2004 Oyster 46 vs 2012 Oyster 575 — Comparison

2004 Oyster 462004 Oyster 46
VS
2012 Oyster 5752012 Oyster 575

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2004 Oyster 462012 Oyster 575
General
ManufacturerOysterOyster
Year2004–20102012–2020
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom
DesignerRob HumphreysRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA14.02 m (46.0 ft)17.55 m (57.6 ft)
LWL11.60 m (38.1 ft)14.80 m (48.6 ft)
Beam4.20 m (13.8 ft)4.80 m (15.7 ft)
Draft2.05 m (6.7 ft)2.40 m (7.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)22,500 kg (49,604 lbs)
Ballast4,800 kg (10,582 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area90.0 m² (969 ft²)135.0 m² (1,453 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP150 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)550 L (145.3 gal)
Water Capacity450 L (118.9 gal)900 L (237.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins34

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2004 Oyster 46
16.97
2012 Oyster 575
17.20
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2004 Oyster 46
38.40
2012 Oyster 575
37.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2004 Oyster 46
0.73
2012 Oyster 575
0.68
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2004 Oyster 46
18.69
2012 Oyster 575
17.52

Detailed Comparison

The 2004 Oyster 46 and 2012 Oyster 575 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Oyster 46 is a 2000s design by Oyster from United Kingdom, while the 2012 Oyster 575 is a modern offering from Oyster from United Kingdom. The 2004 Oyster 46 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 2012 Oyster 575 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 2004 Oyster 46 measures 14.02m (46.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.20m, compared to the 2012 Oyster 575 at 17.55m (57.6ft) with a 4.80m beam. The 2012 Oyster 575 is 3.53m longer than the 2004 Oyster 46. The 2012 Oyster 575 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2004 Oyster 46 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 90.0 m² of sail area. The 2012 Oyster 575, with an SA/D of 17.20 and 135.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Oyster 575 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2004 Oyster 46 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2012 Oyster 575 has a comfort ratio of 17.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.68. The ballast ratios are 38.4% for the 2004 Oyster 46 and 37.8% for the 2012 Oyster 575, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2004 Oyster 46 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 450L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 2012 Oyster 575 offers 8 berths in 4 cabins with 900L water and 550L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2004 Oyster 46 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Oyster 575 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Oyster 575 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2004 Oyster 46 · 2012 Oyster 575