2004 Oyster 46 vs 2013 Moody 54 — Comparison

2004 Oyster 462004 Oyster 46
VS
2013 Moody 542013 Moody 54

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2004 Oyster 462013 Moody 54
General
ManufacturerOysterMoody
Year2004–20102013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUnited KingdomGermany
DesignerRob HumphreysBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA14.02 m (46.0 ft)16.18 m (53.1 ft)
LWL11.60 m (38.1 ft)14.50 m (47.6 ft)
Beam4.20 m (13.8 ft)4.90 m (16.1 ft)
Draft2.05 m (6.7 ft)2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)21,000 kg (46,297 lbs)
Ballast4,800 kg (10,582 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area90.0 m² (969 ft²)125.0 m² (1,346 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP110 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Water Capacity450 L (118.9 gal)700 L (184.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2004 Oyster 46
16.97
2013 Moody 54
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2004 Oyster 46
38.40
2013 Moody 54
35.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2004 Oyster 46
0.73
2013 Moody 54
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2004 Oyster 46
18.69
2013 Moody 54
17.25

Detailed Comparison

The 2004 Oyster 46 and 2013 Moody 54 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Oyster 46 is a 2000s design by Oyster from United Kingdom, while the 2013 Moody 54 is a modern offering from Moody from Germany. The 2004 Oyster 46 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 2013 Moody 54 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2004 Oyster 46 measures 14.02m (46.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.20m, compared to the 2013 Moody 54 at 16.18m (53.1ft) with a 4.90m beam. The 2013 Moody 54 is 2.16m longer than the 2004 Oyster 46. The 2013 Moody 54 displaces approximately 68% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2004 Oyster 46 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 90.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Moody 54, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 125.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2004 Oyster 46 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2004 Oyster 46 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2013 Moody 54 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 38.4% for the 2004 Oyster 46 and 35.7% for the 2013 Moody 54, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2004 Oyster 46 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 450L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 2013 Moody 54 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 700L water and 450L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2004 Oyster 46 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2004 Oyster 46 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2013 Moody 54 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2004 Oyster 46 · 2013 Moody 54