2005 Island Packet 370 vs 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 — Comparison

2005 Island Packet 370
VS
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2005 Island Packet 3701999 Pacific Seacraft 40
General
ManufacturerIsland PacketPacific Seacraft
Year2005–20121999–2007
TypeCutterCutter
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBob JohnsonWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA11.28 m (37.0 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.3 m² (671 ft²)70.0 m² (754 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Water Capacity340 L (89.8 gal)340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Island Packet 370
14.55
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
15.83
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Island Packet 370
40.00
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
40.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Island Packet 370
0.71
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
0.69
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Island Packet 370
25.32
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
23.66

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Island Packet 370 and 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 2005 Island Packet 370 is a 2000s design by Island Packet from USA, while the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is a 1990s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 2005 Island Packet 370 was penned by Bob Johnson. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 2005 Island Packet 370 measures 11.28m (37.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is 0.91m longer than the 2005 Island Packet 370. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Island Packet 370 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.55 and 62.3 m² of sail area. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40, with an SA/D of 15.83 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Island Packet 370 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2005 Island Packet 370 and 40.5% for the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Island Packet 370 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 340L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 340L water and 189L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2005 Island Packet 370 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2005 Island Packet 370 · 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40