2005 Sabre 426 vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison
2005 Sabre 426
1996 Moody 45
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2005 Sabre 426 | 1996 Moody 45 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Sabre | Moody |
| Year | 2005–2012 | 1996–2002 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | UK |
| Designer | Jim Taylor | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.95 m (42.5 ft) | 13.72 m (45.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) | 11.50 m (37.7 ft) |
| Beam | 3.96 m (13.0 ft) | 4.22 m (13.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.98 m (6.5 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,979 kg (22,000 lbs) | 12,500 kg (27,558 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) | 4,900 kg (10,803 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 77.5 m² (834 ft²) | 85.0 m² (915 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 55 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 189 L (49.9 gal) | 250 L (66.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 303 L (80.0 gal) | 450 L (118.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 8 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2005 Sabre 426 and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Sabre 426 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2005 Sabre 426 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the 2005 Sabre 426 measures 12.95m (42.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 1996 Moody 45 is 0.77m longer than the 2005 Sabre 426. The 1996 Moody 45 displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2005 Sabre 426 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.99 and 77.5 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2005 Sabre 426 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2005 Sabre 426 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the 2005 Sabre 426 and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2005 Sabre 426 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1996 Moody 45 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2005 Sabre 426 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1996 Moody 45 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2005 Sabre 426 · 1996 Moody 45