Hanse 342 vs Hunter 240 — Comparison
Hanse 342
Hunter 240
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 342 | Hunter 240 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Hunter |
| Year | 2006–2010 | 1999–2004 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.30 m (33.8 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.20 m (30.2 ft) | 6.17 m (20.2 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs) | 476 kg (1,049 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) | 22.5 m² (242 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 8 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 100 L (26.4 gal) | 19 L (5.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 30 L (7.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 4 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 342 and Hunter 240 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 240 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Hunter 240 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the Hunter 240 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The Hanse 342 is 2.98m longer than the Hunter 240. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 289% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 240, with an SA/D of 18.62 and 22.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 240 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hunter 240 has a comfort ratio of 15.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.88. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 35.0% for the Hunter 240, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The Hunter 240 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L water and 19L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hanse 342 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 240 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 342 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · Hunter 240