2006 Hanse 350 vs 1972 Contest 31 — Comparison
1972 Contest 31
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2006 Hanse 350 | 1972 Contest 31 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Contest |
| Year | 2006–2012 | 1972–1982 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | Netherlands |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | Dick Zaal |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.58 m (34.7 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.40 m (30.8 ft) | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.52 m (11.5 ft) | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) | 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 55.5 m² (597 ft²) | 39.5 m² (425 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Steel |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 75 L (19.8 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 150 L (39.6 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2006 Hanse 350 and 1972 Contest 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Hanse 350 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 2006 Hanse 350 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1972 Contest 31 was designed by Dick Zaal.
In terms of size, the 2006 Hanse 350 measures 10.58m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.52m, compared to the 1972 Contest 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 2006 Hanse 350 is 1.13m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 2006 Hanse 350 displaces approximately 28% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2006 Hanse 350 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.47 and 55.5 m² of sail area. The 1972 Contest 31, with an SA/D of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2006 Hanse 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2006 Hanse 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1972 Contest 31 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 29.3% for the 2006 Hanse 350 and 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2006 Hanse 350 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The 1972 Contest 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2006 Hanse 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2006 Hanse 350 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2006 Hanse 350 · 1972 Contest 31