2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62 vs 1996 MacGregor 65 — Comparison

2008 Hallberg-Rassy 622008 Hallberg-Rassy 62
VS
1996 MacGregor 651996 MacGregor 65

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2008 Hallberg-Rassy 621996 MacGregor 65
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyMacGregor
Year2008–20181996–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersRoger MacGregor
Dimensions
LOA19.05 m (62.5 ft)19.81 m (65.0 ft)
LWL16.30 m (53.5 ft)16.15 m (53.0 ft)
Beam5.20 m (17.1 ft)5.18 m (17.0 ft)
Draft2.60 m (8.5 ft)1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement28,000 kg (61,729 lbs)15,876 kg (35,001 lbs)
Ballast10,000 kg (22,046 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area158.0 m² (1,701 ft²)120.0 m² (1,292 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinCenterboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine200 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity800 L (211.3 gal)380 L (100.4 gal)
Water Capacity1200 L (317.0 gal)760 L (200.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins44

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62
17.40
1996 MacGregor 65
19.30
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62
35.71
1996 MacGregor 65
34.28
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62
0.69
1996 MacGregor 65
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62
16.31
1996 MacGregor 65
9.17

Detailed Comparison

The 2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62 and 1996 MacGregor 65 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1996 MacGregor 65 is a 1990s offering from MacGregor from USA. The 2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62 was penned by German Frers. The 1996 MacGregor 65 was designed by Roger MacGregor.

In terms of size, the 2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62 measures 19.05m (62.5ft) overall with a beam of 5.20m, compared to the 1996 MacGregor 65 at 19.81m (65.0ft) with a 5.18m beam. The 1996 MacGregor 65 is 0.76m longer than the 2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62. The 2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62 displaces approximately 76% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 158.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 MacGregor 65, with an SA/D of 19.30 and 120.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1996 MacGregor 65 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1996 MacGregor 65 has a comfort ratio of 9.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 35.7% for the 2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62 and 34.3% for the 1996 MacGregor 65, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62 provides 8 berths in 4 cabins with 1200L of water capacity and 800L of fuel. The 1996 MacGregor 65 offers 8 berths in 4 cabins with 760L water and 380L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 MacGregor 65 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2008 Hallberg-Rassy 62 · 1996 MacGregor 65