Hanse 470 vs 2013 Moody 54 — Comparison

Hanse 470
VS
2013 Moody 542013 Moody 54

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 4702013 Moody 54
General
ManufacturerHanseMoody
Year2013–20172013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyGermany
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA14.45 m (47.4 ft)16.18 m (53.1 ft)
LWL12.85 m (42.2 ft)14.50 m (47.6 ft)
Beam4.42 m (14.5 ft)4.90 m (16.1 ft)
Draft2.25 m (7.4 ft)2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement11,800 kg (26,015 lbs)21,000 kg (46,297 lbs)
Ballast3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area96.0 m² (1,033 ft²)125.0 m² (1,346 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP110 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Water Capacity430 L (113.6 gal)700 L (184.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths108
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 470
18.81
2013 Moody 54
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 470
31.36
2013 Moody 54
35.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 470
0.78
2013 Moody 54
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 470
14.09
2013 Moody 54
17.25

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 470 and 2013 Moody 54 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 470 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2013 Moody 54 is a modern offering from Moody from Germany. The Hanse 470 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 2013 Moody 54 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the Hanse 470 measures 14.45m (47.4ft) overall with a beam of 4.42m, compared to the 2013 Moody 54 at 16.18m (53.1ft) with a 4.90m beam. The 2013 Moody 54 is 1.73m longer than the Hanse 470. The 2013 Moody 54 displaces approximately 78% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 470 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.81 and 96.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Moody 54, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 125.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 470 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 470 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2013 Moody 54 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 31.4% for the Hanse 470 and 35.7% for the 2013 Moody 54, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 470 provides 10 berths in 3 cabins with 430L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 2013 Moody 54 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 700L water and 450L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2013 Moody 54 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 470 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 470 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 470 · 2013 Moody 54