1986 J/28 vs Hunter 212 — Comparison

1986 J/28
VS
Hunter 212Hunter 212

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 J/28Hunter 212
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsHunter
Year1986–19902003–2008
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA8.66 m (28.4 ft)6.35 m (20.8 ft)
LWL7.32 m (24.0 ft)5.56 m (18.2 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.26 m (7.4 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)0.99 m (3.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)680 kg (1,499 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)168 kg (370 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area37.6 m² (405 ft²)16.0 m² (172 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinCenterboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP4 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)15 L (4.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths53
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 J/28
18.59
Hunter 212
21.04
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 J/28
46.17
Hunter 212
24.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 J/28
0.85
Hunter 212
1.03
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 J/28
17.20
Hunter 212
10.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 J/28 and Hunter 212 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 J/28 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hunter 212 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1986 J/28 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hunter 212 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1986 J/28 measures 8.66m (28.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hunter 212 at 6.35m (20.8ft) with a 2.26m beam. The 1986 J/28 is 2.31m longer than the Hunter 212. The 1986 J/28 displaces approximately 334% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 J/28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 37.6 m² of sail area. The Hunter 212, with an SA/D of 21.04 and 16.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The Hunter 212 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 J/28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The Hunter 212 has a comfort ratio of 10.5 and a capsize screening value of 1.03. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1986 J/28 and 24.7% for the Hunter 212, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 J/28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 212 offers 3 berths in 1 cabin with 15L water and unspecified fuel.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 J/28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 212 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 J/28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 J/28 · Hunter 212