Hunter 185 vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison

Hunter 185Hunter 185
VS
1982 Freedom 281982 Freedom 28

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 1851982 Freedom 28
General
ManufacturerHunterFreedom
Year2000–20071982–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHunter Design TeamGarry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA5.54 m (18.2 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL4.95 m (16.2 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam2.13 m (7.0 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft0.91 m (3.0 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement408 kg (899 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast82 kg (181 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area13.0 m² (140 ft²)29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeCenterboardFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths25
Cabins1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 185
24.03
1982 Freedom 28
16.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 185
20.10
1982 Freedom 28
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 185
1.15
1982 Freedom 28
0.84
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 185
8.72
1982 Freedom 28
17.13

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 185 and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 185 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The Hunter 185 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the Hunter 185 measures 5.54m (18.2ft) overall with a beam of 2.13m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1982 Freedom 28 is 2.99m longer than the Hunter 185. The 1982 Freedom 28 displaces approximately 512% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 185 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 24.03 and 13.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 185 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 185 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.15). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 20.1% for the Hunter 185 and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 185 provides 2 berths with unspecified water tankage and unspecified fuel capacity. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Freedom 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 185 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Freedom 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 185 · 1982 Freedom 28