2001 Hunter 410 vs 1998 Feeling 44 — Comparison

2001 Hunter 4102001 Hunter 410
VS
1998 Feeling 44

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2001 Hunter 4101998 Feeling 44
General
ManufacturerHunterFeeling
Year2001–20061998–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerGlenn HendersonPhilippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios
Dimensions
LOA12.50 m (41.0 ft)13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL10.67 m (35.0 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam4.04 m (13.3 ft)4.10 m (13.5 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)4,000 kg (8,818 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area74.3 m² (800 ft²)82.0 m² (883 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2001 Hunter 410
16.80
1998 Feeling 44
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2001 Hunter 410
38.10
1998 Feeling 44
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2001 Hunter 410
0.76
1998 Feeling 44
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2001 Hunter 410
18.10
1998 Feeling 44
16.90

Detailed Comparison

The 2001 Hunter 410 and 1998 Feeling 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2001 Hunter 410 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2001 Hunter 410 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1998 Feeling 44 was designed by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios.

In terms of size, the 2001 Hunter 410 measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.04m, compared to the 1998 Feeling 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.10m beam. The 1998 Feeling 44 is 0.91m longer than the 2001 Hunter 410. The 1998 Feeling 44 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2001 Hunter 410 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 74.3 m² of sail area. The 1998 Feeling 44, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1998 Feeling 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2001 Hunter 410 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1998 Feeling 44 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the 2001 Hunter 410 and 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2001 Hunter 410 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1998 Feeling 44 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2001 Hunter 410 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Feeling 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2001 Hunter 410 · 1998 Feeling 44