2004 Hunter 466 vs Bavaria 42 — Comparison

2004 Hunter 4662004 Hunter 466
VS
Bavaria 42Bavaria 42

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2004 Hunter 466Bavaria 42
General
ManufacturerHunterBavaria
Year2004–20082003–2008
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGlenn HendersonJ&J Design
Dimensions
LOA14.17 m (46.5 ft)12.99 m (42.6 ft)
LWL12.50 m (41.0 ft)11.29 m (37.0 ft)
Beam4.37 m (14.3 ft)4.06 m (13.3 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement12,247 kg (27,000 lbs)9,300 kg (20,503 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)2,900 kg (6,393 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area90.5 m² (974 ft²)79.0 m² (850 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity379 L (100.1 gal)350 L (92.5 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2004 Hunter 466
17.30
Bavaria 42
18.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2004 Hunter 466
33.33
Bavaria 42
31.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2004 Hunter 466
0.76
Bavaria 42
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2004 Hunter 466
15.61
Bavaria 42
15.87

Detailed Comparison

The 2004 Hunter 466 and Bavaria 42 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Hunter 466 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the Bavaria 42 is a 2000s offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 2004 Hunter 466 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Bavaria 42 was designed by J&J Design.

In terms of size, the 2004 Hunter 466 measures 14.17m (46.5ft) overall with a beam of 4.37m, compared to the Bavaria 42 at 12.99m (42.6ft) with a 4.06m beam. The 2004 Hunter 466 is 1.18m longer than the Bavaria 42. The 2004 Hunter 466 displaces approximately 32% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2004 Hunter 466 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.30 and 90.5 m² of sail area. The Bavaria 42, with an SA/D of 18.15 and 79.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2004 Hunter 466 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Bavaria 42 has a comfort ratio of 15.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 33.3% for the 2004 Hunter 466 and 31.2% for the Bavaria 42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2004 Hunter 466 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The Bavaria 42 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 350L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Bavaria 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2004 Hunter 466 · Bavaria 42