2014 Oyster 625 vs 1996 MacGregor 65 — Comparison

2014 Oyster 625
VS
1996 MacGregor 651996 MacGregor 65

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2014 Oyster 6251996 MacGregor 65
General
ManufacturerOysterMacGregor
Year2014–20201996–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUSA
DesignerRob HumphreysRoger MacGregor
Dimensions
LOA19.20 m (63.0 ft)19.81 m (65.0 ft)
LWL16.50 m (54.1 ft)16.15 m (53.0 ft)
Beam5.30 m (17.4 ft)5.18 m (17.0 ft)
Draft2.40 m (7.9 ft)1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement32,000 kg (70,548 lbs)15,876 kg (35,001 lbs)
Ballast12,000 kg (26,455 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area175.0 m² (1,884 ft²)120.0 m² (1,292 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinCenterboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine180 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity800 L (211.3 gal)380 L (100.4 gal)
Water Capacity1200 L (317.0 gal)760 L (200.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins44

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2014 Oyster 625
17.63
1996 MacGregor 65
19.30
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2014 Oyster 625
37.50
1996 MacGregor 65
34.28
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2014 Oyster 625
0.67
1996 MacGregor 65
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2014 Oyster 625
17.79
1996 MacGregor 65
9.17

Detailed Comparison

The 2014 Oyster 625 and 1996 MacGregor 65 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2014 Oyster 625 is a modern design by Oyster from UK, while the 1996 MacGregor 65 is a 1990s offering from MacGregor from USA. The 2014 Oyster 625 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 1996 MacGregor 65 was designed by Roger MacGregor.

In terms of size, the 2014 Oyster 625 measures 19.20m (63.0ft) overall with a beam of 5.30m, compared to the 1996 MacGregor 65 at 19.81m (65.0ft) with a 5.18m beam. The 1996 MacGregor 65 is 0.61m longer than the 2014 Oyster 625. The 2014 Oyster 625 displaces approximately 102% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2014 Oyster 625 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.63 and 175.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 MacGregor 65, with an SA/D of 19.30 and 120.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1996 MacGregor 65 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2014 Oyster 625 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The 1996 MacGregor 65 has a comfort ratio of 9.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 2014 Oyster 625 and 34.3% for the 1996 MacGregor 65, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2014 Oyster 625 provides 8 berths in 4 cabins with 1200L of water capacity and 800L of fuel. The 1996 MacGregor 65 offers 8 berths in 4 cabins with 760L water and 380L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2014 Oyster 625 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 MacGregor 65 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2014 Oyster 625 · 1996 MacGregor 65