1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 vs 1982 Cape Dory 36 — Comparison

1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
VS
1982 Cape Dory 361982 Cape Dory 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Pacific Seacraft 341982 Cape Dory 36
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftCape Dory
Year1990–20071982–1990
TypeCutterCutter
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam CrealockCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)8.69 m (28.5 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)6,804 kg (15,000 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.5 m² (554 ft²)55.5 m² (597 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
15.26
1982 Cape Dory 36
15.70
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
42.87
1982 Cape Dory 36
40.01
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
0.69
1982 Cape Dory 36
0.69
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
26.98
1982 Cape Dory 36
24.45

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 and 1982 Cape Dory 36 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is a 1990s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1982 Cape Dory 36 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 was penned by William Crealock. The 1982 Cape Dory 36 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1982 Cape Dory 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.28m beam. The 1982 Cape Dory 36 is 0.61m longer than the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34. The 1982 Cape Dory 36 displaces approximately 7% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.26 and 51.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Cape Dory 36, with an SA/D of 15.70 and 55.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 Cape Dory 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 27.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1982 Cape Dory 36 has a comfort ratio of 24.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 and 40.0% for the 1982 Cape Dory 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1982 Cape Dory 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Cape Dory 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 · 1982 Cape Dory 36