1984 MacGregor 26 vs 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 — Comparison

1984 MacGregor 261984 MacGregor 26
VS
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 241980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 MacGregor 261980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
General
ManufacturerMacGregorPacific Seacraft
Year1984–19951980–2007
TypeSloopCutter
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger MacGregorWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA7.80 m (25.6 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)5.79 m (19.0 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)2.54 m (8.3 ft)
Draft0.61 m (2.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement998 kg (2,200 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast227 kg (500 lbs)1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area22.3 m² (240 ft²)23.5 m² (253 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeCenterboardFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine5 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity15 L (4.0 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths63
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.70
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
12.98
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.75
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
41.80
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 MacGregor 26
1.04
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 MacGregor 26
8.72
1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24
28.37

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 MacGregor 26 and 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is a 1980s design by MacGregor from USA, while the 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1984 MacGregor 26 was penned by Roger MacGregor. The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1984 MacGregor 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.54m beam. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is 0.48m longer than the 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24. The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 displaces approximately 150% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 MacGregor 26 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 22.70 and 22.3 m² of sail area. The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24, with an SA/D of 12.98 and 23.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 MacGregor 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.04). The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 has a comfort ratio of 28.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 22.8% for the 1984 MacGregor 26 and 41.8% for the 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 MacGregor 26 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 offers 3 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 MacGregor 26 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 MacGregor 26 · 1980 Pacific Seacraft Dana 24